In George Orwell's "1984"
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Who
controls the past,(Sun
Worship) controls the future:(Sun
Worship)
who controls the present,(Sun Worship) controls the past.(Sun Worship) George Orwell |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 It is some sixty years
since George Orwell published his prophetic novel, 1984,
and in the light of current events it is a perfect time to
remind ourselves that we are indeed rapidly heading for
the Orwellian nightmare described so brilliantly in his
book. If anyone wants to see the world the Jesuits want to
impose, then just read 1984.As Orwell wrote: "if you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face-forever". This does not have to come to pass, but it will unless asses and seats part company. It is already doing so-by the day. 1984, written in 1948, is described as a political satire, but it's not. It is a political prophecy and there is no way that Orwell could have been so accurate without a deep understanding of the way the world was going, even possibly inside knowledge of what was planned. Orwell had many contacts in political circles and mixed with the elite from his days at the exclusive Eton College, where royalty is educated. It is far from impossible that he picked up the threads of what was intended to be. Orwell also worked for the BBC when it was under the control of ministry of Information, a wonderful Orwellian title in itself for an organization created to communicate dis-information. Orwell (real name Eric Blair) described a global society of total control in which the people were not even allowed to have  thoughts that disagreed with
the authorities. They were subject to the Thought Police who
dealt with anyone guilty of thought-crime. In the Orwellian
world, the people were not allowed a personal life and
everything they did, or thought, was controlled.
The government, or Part, was headed by "BB", or Big
Brother, who appeared on posters everywhere with the
words: "Big Brother is watching you". In the smoke
and mirrors society that Orwell describes, Big Brother
himself could have been a myth to hide the real controllers, who are
controlled by forces that the public have no idea exist.
Orwell's Big Brother may not even have existed,
either, but the people were sold the story of his battle
to save them from the terrorist, Emmanuel Goldstein, the
alleged prime threat to the 'free world'.
Goldstein had been in league with Big Brother during
the revolution, the story goes, but he was said to have
become a major part of the resistance Brotherhood
(al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden and whoever the authorities
blame next for their own terrorism). Orwell implies
that Goldstein, too, either does not exist, or was
eliminated, but as long as the people believe
in his existence and his complicity in terrorism they would
support the actions taken by the government to protect them
from his terror.
Heard that somewhere before?
Orwell describes the
sequence of events that led to the creation of the Big
Brother state. A revolution in the United Kingdom turned
to civil war and , the same time, the Soviet Union
embarked on a mass invasion of mainland Europe,
overrunning the entire continent, apart from the British
Isles and Iceland. A Third World War then broke out
between the three emerging powers of Oceania (including
Britain and led by what had previously been the United
States); Eastasia (controlled by a revitalized China); and
Eurasia (the expanded Soviet Union). During this
struggle for total power hundreds of atomic bombs were
dropped on Europe, western Russia and North America.
Every since the mid-1990s they have been building up
China to trigger the imposition of a world government.
This has been happening over the years, and
look at the way the media is now full of stories about a
'reviltalised' China and its massive military and economic
capability. The way the world was separated into
giant superstates is happening today with the Europe
Union, African Union, the planned American Union and
Pacific Union, as you will see later. The three superstates in
1984 eventually realized that a continuous stalemate war (war on terrorism) was
far more effective than victory. The
Constant war kept the people focused and busy
manufacturing weapons and goods for the conflict.
The standard of living was appalling because it was understood that a poor (government bank bail out) and needy population was easier to control than a rich and abundant one. The three superpowers take over most of the world, but leave one region officially 'free' so  they have something to
fight over. This 'disputed zone' includes the
northern half of Africa, the Middle East, southern India
and down towards Indonesia and norther Australia.
The warring factions rarely fight in their own
territory. Airstrip One (the official name for
Britain) is apparently the target of Eurasian 'rocket
bombs', but it is hinted that the Oceania government is
launching these attacks on its own land to convince
Airstrip One's urban populations that they are under
constant attack ('war on
terrorism', 9/11
and the London bombings, etc.). By the year
1984, Airstrip One becomes a police state and mere
province of the enormous Oceania (European Union).
The People are segregated into three classes-the Inner Party, Outer Party and Proles-who are
controlled by four ministries housed in massive pyramid
structures. The ministries are named in line with
Orwell's law of language manipulation, which he called Newspeak. This demands that
you call everything the opposite of what it actually
does. You can see this technique used
throughout society today-remember the Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace that was manipulating war?
The Orwellian ministries are:
Orwell's novel features a
character call Winston Smith, a member of the Outer Party,
who lives in the ruins of London, the major city of
Airstrip One (Britain). His parents died during the
civil war and he is recruited by the 'Ingsoc' (English
socialism) movement. He is given a job with the
Ministry of Truth, which controls
all media in the Oceania superstate. One of
his roles is to rewrite
historical records to comply with the party's
version of what happened. The idea was to make the 'past' conform to the
Party's version of what happened. The idea was
to make the 'past'
conform to the political expediency necessary to justify
current actions. Winston wants to know real history and tries
to uncover the forbidden
truth. He also
 keeps an illegal diary of
events. While at the Ministry of Truth, he meets Julia, a
mechanic who maintains the 'novel-Writing machines', and
they begin an illegal relationship. There was no
personal freedom and that included relationships.
Sex for pleasure was discouraged and employed
only for the procreation of new members of the Party.
Artificial insemination was the preferred method.
Sexual life was entirely regulated by the two Newspeak words, sexcrime (sexual
immorality) and goodsex
(chastity). Sexcrime covered all sexual 'misdeeds',
including fornication, adultery, homosexuality and
heterosexual intercourse practiced for its own sake.
They were all punishable by death. The term, 'sex crime', is now in
very days use, of course.Winston and Julia are forced to meet in the countryside away from the surveillance cameras, and in a room above an antique shop. Winston begins to question the lies of Ingsoc and the Party structure, and the couple are targeted by the Thought Police and a member of the Inner Party called O'Brien, who poses as a contact from the Resistance. O'Brien gives him a copy of 'the book', allegedly written by 'terrorist' Emanuel Goldstein, with its exposure of Ingsoc. Winston and Julia are arrested by the Thought police and taken for interrogation to the Ministry of Love, where dissidents are tortured and executed. During the torture, O'Brien tells Winston that thy are not interested in securing a false confession, Instead, the idea is to use torture(the return of the inquisition) and electroshock 'therapy' to change the way he thinks and to 'cure' his hatred of the Party. This reprogramming is revealed to be successful in the final sentence of the Orwell's book with the words: 'He loved Big Brother'. Winston also writes that 2+2=5 as confirmation that he has lost control of his own mind. Interestingly, they use Winston's fear of rats to destroy his feelings for Julia, and this is a major technique use on children and adults in the government mind control projects that turn out millions of mind-slaves to serve the global agenda. They find out what most terrifies the victim, often a small child, and make them experience it. This could be a fear of spiders, snakes or in Winston's case, rats. This state of sheer terror is Manipulated to rewire the mind and its perceptions of reality. Now this is what was done at 9/11, to put terror,rewire and manipulate millions of mind-slaves to serve the New World Order. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Programming the language | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The theme of 1984 is mass
and individual mind control through fear and trauma and
the manipulation of language. The latter is most
obviously expressed today through what is called 'political correctness'
and 'hate speech',
or 'hate crime'.
These terms alone could have been invented by
Orwell, who explained how vital language is to perception.
Orwell coined the term, 'Newspeak', for the official language of
Oceania and the number of words available was reduced
every year-see political correctness, 'hate speech', and the
mobile 'phone text
'language', which are fulfilling precisely this
role today. Newspeak
was based on the premise that the fewer words that are
available, the less efficiently you can articulate your
views. But it went even further. In this reality, we also think
in words and limiting
the language available diminishes your ability to even
think freely.(I Pod phones) As one Internet article
put it:'...Can we communicate the need for freedom, or
organize an uprising, if we do not have the words
for either?' Newspeak
was designed to eliminate all meaning from language,
leaving only blandness that says nothing, and it replaced
the previous vibrant language known as 'Oldspeak'. This
is what is happening today. The word free still
existed in Newspeak,
but could only be used in statements like 'the
dog is free from lice' or 'this
field is free from weeds'. It could not be
used in its old sense of 'politically
free' or 'intellectually
free', since political and intellectual freedom
no longer existed, even as concepts, and were, therefore,
nameless. All words relating to concepts of liberty
and equality were contained in the single word, Crimethink, while all
words relating to objectivity and rationalism were
contained in the single word, Oldthink. When Tony Blair came to
power in the British Labour Party he denounced 'old
Labour' and renamed the party 'New" Labour. With
that , all 'old Labour' thinking and language were expunged from
debate.
Words that
powerfully express the opposite meaning to those
promoted in the propaganda are eliminated in the world
of 1984. The opposite of 'good' was 'bad', so bad is
replaced by 'ungood'.
Instead of meaningful words like 'best' comes the term
'doubleplusgood'.
Very bad becomes 'doubleplusungood'.
We are seeing the ever-increasing introduction of
such meaningless words into our language all the the
time to hide the reality of what is happening. One
example of how words are used to obscure the truth is
the way that 'civilian
casualties' or 'dead people' have become 'collateral damage'.
Labels are also applied to discredit opponents by
the implication behind the terms used to describe them.
If you challenge the impositions of the authorities you are
an 'anti-government
group'; If you suggest, indeed prove,
that the government is
lying you are a 'conspiracy theorist'.
No words could be so true as these. Conspiracy theories only remain theories when there is no judge, no court, no legal representative, no assembly, with the valor to expose the evidence. In every case where the evidence is put into practice, the theory becomes instantly recognizable as a case of criminal conspiracy. Here are some other examples of language manipulation based on the Politically Incorrect Dictionary.
 'Change'
is another word spun
by the Orwellians. This is generally used to suggest
that a particular idea is good because it is newer; but
newer is not always better. Nazism and
communism were 'change'.
Tony Blair,
Barrack Hussien Obama
buzz words were always 'change'
and 'reform' and
they are used in the context that 'change' and 'reform' are, by
definition, good,
and what they replace is 'bad'.
Then there are the new words, or Newspeak, and the
redefinition of words to make people sound 'bad' for having
legitimate, often caring, views. Those who oppose
'globalization'-the centralization of global power and the
criminal abuse of poor people countries-are dubbed 'anarchists', or 'anti-capitalist demonstrators'
when what they are actually opposing is 'cartelism'.
Someone who thinks differently, or questions the
fundamental nonsense of the way the world is run, is
called an 'extremist'.(or
a Terrorist) If you resist injustice your are a 'militant'. A 'peacekeeper' is some one
who occupies another country, and the 'peace process'
is the means of placating an oppressed people in an
effort to stop them
opposing their oppression. It is a 'road map' with no
destination, because where you want to get is where you already are.
'Western values' are the values that must be imposed on
the rest of the world when those 'values are not even
applied in the 'West'. 1984 is greater suppression
and control until the most extreme of the techniques
Orwell described are in place. In the world of 1984,
three Party slogans were displayed to indoctrinate the
people. These were:
By no coincidence whatsoever, this is what we are
being told endlessly today. These are
expressions of Orwell's doublethink when two apparently
contradictory thoughts are both considered to be true.
There are so many modern examples. Bush and
Blair talked about 'fighting
for peace' and going
to war because they 'want peace'. Any statement that
includes support for 'fighting' or 'war' cannot be about
peace. It is about fighting and war. Boy Bush's speechwriters had
him say after 9/11:
 This is what the Jesuits, and other
groups and secret societies based on the Jesuits, demand of
their initiates. They must believe what their
superiors tell them to believe, no matter what the
evidence to the contrary. St. Ignatious of Loyola: That which appears
white is really black. We should always be disposed to
believe that which appears white is really black if the
hierarchy of the Church so decides. (if Big
Brother decides) A text book example of what Orwell
writes. (more on Jesuits)
By employing doublethink, the
Party(government) was able not only to
bomb its own people and tell them it was an attack by
the enemy, (9/11 inside Job) the Party members
(that 19 camel jockeys flew the planes) were indoctrinated
to believe that the bombs were launched by the enemy. (a
false enemy) Orwell's Big Brother society had another Newspeak word called facecrime, which was
the indication that a person was guilty of thoughtcrime, based on
their facial expression. We now have technology and
surveillance being introduced to do just that -to study
body crimestop,
which meant to rid oneself of unwanted thoughts and thus
prevent a thoughtcrime
or crimethink.
Orewell wrote:
This applies to anyone who
voted for Bush or Blair or supported the invasion of Iraq.
Orwell says that in the last part of the 20th
century technology is driven by two things-'war and the desire to
determine against his will what
another human being is 'thinking'. This is
where we are today with technological innovation that is
also motivated by ever more sophisticated methods of control and surveillance.
Orwell writes about the telescreens, and obligatory item in every
home which both transmits constant propaganda and has the
means to film and record all activity and conversation.
This is the Orwellian vision of telescreen
surveillance and indoctrination:
The propaganda part of the
telescreen is
already well established. We call it television and
it bombards the collective
mind
with the official
version of life, all day, every day. Fox News,
CNN and the BBC are some of the most blatant examples, but
the entire mainstream media is pretty much the same.
We may have endless channels, but they are basically
the same one, churning out the same unquestioned official
line. 'Nonsensical
explanations' for events like 9/11 become accepted
'history purely through repetition on the telescreens
and in the newspapers (propaganda sheets),and by the
suppression of investigation to establish if the
official version of events stands up to scrutiny (creating a false reality).
No words could be so true as these. Conspiracy theories only remain theories when there is no judge, no court, no legal representative, no assembly, with the valor to expose the evidence. In every case where the evidence is put into practice, the theory becomes instantly recognizable as a case of criminal conspiracy. The technology we are allowed to see is light years behind that which actually exists, and the scale of surveillance is already far, far closer to that of Orwell's telescreens than most people begin to realize. Even with the technology we know about, the reach of surveillance is now incredible. Walk through a town or city in Britain today and you pass from camera to camera with pretty much your whole journey recorded. Go into most shops and it's the same, as it is when you take your own money from a ATM. Virtually everything you do in town or city outside of your home is watched and recorded. Next it will be inside your home, as Orwell envisaged. Indeed is it even 'next'? They are now introducing vehicle technology that logs your every journey in detail, and microchips that can immobilize your engine at will via satellite. In Britain,'speaking' surveillance cameras are being introduced that allow their operators to give orders to people in the street-just as Orwell's telescreens could. Everything you do on your computer, where you surf, or what you communicate, is logged. It is the same with your phone calls. The laws that allow this to be done legally increased by the month, all justified by the bogus 'war on terrorism', which resulted from the bogus version of what happened on September 11, 2001. President obama Signed the National Defense Authorization Act in January of 2012 which makes it all legal. Orwell could hardly have described it any better!! Orwell talked of the 'proles' or 'proletarians', which made up around 85 per cent of the population. They were the unthinking masses and the authorities looked upon them as cattle, just as they do today. They didn't suffer the level of surveillance of those considered intellectually dangerous, because they didn't' question anything. They were given   prolefeed,
the brain-numbing
'entertainment' (Hollywood) and made-up 'news'
(nightly news) for the masses that kept them dumbed down and incapable
of free thought. Spot on again, it turns
out. There was the unperson, someone removed from
circulation and all files until he or she officially
ceased to exist (Guantanamo Bay and those who have simply
disappeared never to be seen again). To talk about
an unperson was a thought crime, just as to highlight the
suffering , indignity
and injustice imposed upon the inmates of Guantanamo Bay
has been considered to be 'supporting the terrorists'. Anything
in any publication that put the Orwellian government in a
bad light was described in Newspeak as malreported or malquoted. Once again, the
authorities were never wrong. We are now seeing
the Orwellian 'anti-terrorism'
programmers being introduced to encourage and
reward the public to spy on each other, and report their
neighbors, workmates, clients and fellow students to the
authorities. All this is straight out of 1984.How Orwell could be so prophetic and accurate is less important than the fact that he was. The solemn mission of this page is to remove the deceptive smokescreen and expose Satan's masterpiece on earth so that you may turn tragedy into triumph and rise to meet the Lord in the air when He returns. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Now for the connection with
Rome and American History. Click here |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Babylonia system(Sun Worship) is a system of
rationalization to do legally what is forbidden morally. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Now if you have followed
the above blue print, below is a perfect example of
Newspeak, Doublethink and Jesuit
Casuistry.
The below video is from the Rachel Maddow show on MSMBC. When
you understand the Jesuit blue print that is laid out by
George Orwell then our foreign policy and the 'war on terrorism'
becomes real clear. They need: The laws
that allow this to be done
legally
increased by the month, all justified by
the bogus 'war on terrorism', which resulted
from the bogus version of what
happened on September 11, 2001. President
obama Signed the National Defense Authorization Act in January of
2012 which makes it all legal. Orwell could hardly
have described it any better!!
|
See, we love-we
love freedom. That's what they didn't
understand. They hate things; we love things. They
act out of hatred; we don't seek revenge, we seek
justice out of love. You need to tell your
loved ones, the little ones in particular, that
when they hear the President talking about
al-Qaeda, Iraq and other places, I do so because I
long for peace. I want to send the signal to
our enemy that you have aroused a compassionate
and decent and might nation, and we're going to
hunt you down
No comments:
Post a Comment